2025–26 Serie A Preview

Analytics Over Allegiances

The Takeaway:
The 2025–26 Serie A season kicks off with tectonic shifts in tactical identity, financial engineering, and a war of data vs. legacy. Milan’s €200M overhaul, Atalanta’s algorithmic scouting machine, and Napoli’s goal contribution efficiency—this season won’t be won on vibes.

📊 Topline Metrics That Matter

Club

Net Spend (€M)

Avg Age

xG Diff (2024–25)

Possession %

Press Success %

Squad Value (€M)

Inter

+18.4

27.2

+24.1

58.1%

41.7%

568.9

Milan

-74.5

24.9

+11.3

61.2%

43.5%

612.0

Juventus

-11.3

26.5

+7.8

54.7%

39.1%

487.4

Napoli

-38.6

26.1

+15.6

56.9%

45.0%

499.0

Atalanta

-2.2

25.3

+19.7

54.5%

46.3%

368.2

💡 xG Diff = Expected Goals For – Expected Goals Against

🧠 The Big Brains Behind the Touchlines

Inter (Inzaghi): Data-backed shape rotation. Highest xT (expected threat) from wingbacks.
Milan (Fonseca): Press-heavy vertical build. Top 3 in Europe in passes into final third per 90.
Juventus (Thiago Motta): Positional play maestro. xThreat model driven by overloads in Zone 14.
Atalanta (Gasparini): Serie A’s Moneyball lab—6 players scouted from under-23 leagues with sub-€8M tags.

🔥 Who’s Hot by the Numbers?

Victor Osimhen (Napoli)

  • 2024–25 Goals: 18 | xG: 19.2 | NP Goals per 90: 0.74

  • 💣 Finishing slightly under xG, but elite movement metrics.

Joshua Zirkzee (Milan)

  • Age: 24 | Dribbles Completed per 90: 3.9

  • 🔥 Most progressive carries per 90 among Serie A strikers.

Teun Koopmeiners (Atalanta)

  • Key Passes per 90: 2.6 | Progressive Passes: 9.1

  • 🧠 Tactically invaluable; 6.2 OBV (On-Ball Value) per match.

📉 Regression Watch

  • Roma: Overperformed last season by +9.3 in expected goal difference vs actual. Aging midfield with declining ground duel %.

  • Lazio: Shot conversion (13.9%) way above expected (10.1%)—prime for offensive drop-off.

📈 Breakout Candidates (By Data Trendlines)

Player

Club

U23

P90 OBV

Note

Matías Soulé

Juventus

0.42

Returning from Frosinone loan, elite 1v1 winger.

Tommaso Baldanzi

Roma

0.38

High press-resistance, creative playmaker role.

Giorgio Scalvini

Atalanta

0.35

Top 3 Serie A in defensive actions per 90.

💰 Serie A Economics Snapshot

Revenue Stream

Avg Per Club (€M)

YoY Growth

Broadcasting

110.2

+3.1%

Matchday

29.4

+5.8%

Sponsorship & Comm

65.1

+8.7%

Transfers Profit

19.8

-2.3%

Inter, Milan, and Napoli are now above €500M annual revenue clubs—closing the European competitiveness gap.

🧬 Predictive Table (Blunt Model v1.3, xG + OBV-weighted)

Rank

Club

Projected Pts

Reason

1

Inter

83.4

Balanced xG/xGA, squad depth, OBV leadership.

2

Milan

80.2

Most improved OBV spine (Zirkzee, Reijnders).

3

Napoli

77.8

Osimhen, Kvaratskhelia still over xG curve.

4

Juventus

73.1

Motta-style system stabilizing.

5

Atalanta

71.4

Top-5 in all efficiency metrics, but depth limited.

📌 Bottom Line

This is not your dad’s Serie A. The 2025–26 campaign is a case study in applied analytics:

  • Younger squads.

  • Data-led signings.

  • xG optimization.

  • Financial sustainability + algorithmic scouting.

If you're not reading OBV, xT, and progressive pass maps—you're already behind.

OBV in the context of sports analytics (specifically football/soccer) typically stands for:

🧠 On-Ball Value (OBV)

Definition:
OBV is a metric that quantifies the value of a player’s actions when they are on the ball. It assigns a number to each pass, carry, or dribble based on how much it increases (or decreases) a team's likelihood of scoring.

📊 Why OBV Matters

Most traditional stats like goals, assists, or even xG only tell part of the story. OBV captures how valuable a player is in progressing play, breaking lines, or setting up goal-scoring opportunities—even if they don’t get the assist or shot.

Subscribe to Blunt Insights for elite sports strategy & data.
Share this with someone who still thinks xG is a gimmick.
Drop a ⚽ if your club’s ready—or 😬 if they’re getting cooked by OBV this year.