- Blunt Insights
- Posts
- 🧠 MLB Draft 2025: Where Data Picks Winners, Not Hype
🧠 MLB Draft 2025: Where Data Picks Winners, Not Hype
Strategy meets spin rates.
Samuel Rogers
July 09, 2025
🧬 The Draft is Broken. Here’s How Smart Teams Are Gaming It.
The 2025 MLB Draft isn’t just a pick’em. It’s a bonus pool chess match, a pitcher’s K/BB data sweep, and a power-hitter exit velocity drag race. With only eight players rated ≥50 Future Value (FV), this is the flattest top tier in years — meaning analytics-first teams gain a compounding edge.
🧠 Translation:
There’s no “sure thing” at the top. There is outsized value in how you play the board.
🧾 3 Core Trends Defining the 2025 Draft
1. Bonus Pool Arbitrage Is the Real Game
Team | Bonus Pool | Strategy |
|---|---|---|
Mariners | $17.07M (No. 3) | Underslot early, overslot prep upside |
Angels | $16.66M (No. 2) | College arms with quick runway |
Nationals | $16.60M (No. 1) | Safe ceiling, stable floor (Kade Anderson) |
💡 Flat class = flatter ROI curve = mid-rounds matter more.
2. K-BB% is King for Pitchers
Pitcher | K% | BB% | K-BB% | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Kade Anderson | 39.4% | 5.5% | 33.9% | High whiff + command metrics |
Liam Doyle | 38.2% | 4.9% | 33.3% | Highest FIP-adjusted value |
Jamie Arnold | 35.1% | 7.2% | 27.9% | Raw stuff > command |
🧠 K-BB% > 30% is the gold standard for future SP success.
Teams like the Nationals and Angels are filtering for this at the top of their boards.
3. Exit Velocity is Today’s OBP
Player | Max EV (mph) | Avg EV | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
Ethan Holliday | 113.2 | 92.4 | 65 power grade, massive upside |
Aiva Arquette | 112.9 | 93.1 | College bat with elite EV |
George Lombard Jr | 110.6 | 91.8 | Futures Game standout |
💣 EV ≥92 mph + Barrel % >10% = Projected 30+ HR power.
Scouting meets Statcast. Smart orgs already modeled this.
🔎 Team Strategy Matrix: Who’s Playing It Right?
Team | Strategy Type | Data-Based Moves |
|---|---|---|
Mariners | Pool Arbitrage | 3rd pick → underslot + prep bat reinvest |
Tigers | Upside Hunting | HS bats + raw power profile (Slater de Brun) |
Guardians | Late-Round Maximizing | Overslot 6th/10th round arms |
Nationals | Floor Protecting | Kade Anderson = stability play |
🧠 The Data-Driven Draft Framework
Round Range | Role | Data Focus |
|---|---|---|
1–3 | Anchor Picks | K-BB%, EV, pitch movement, OBP/SLG |
4–10 | Value Swings | Exit velo sleepers, prep tools |
11–20 | Pool Arbitrage | Undervalued seniors, signability |
💡 Smart orgs simulate 1,000+ draft boards based on predictive WAR models and Monte Carlo risk-weighted player comps.
🚨 What Front Offices Know (And You Should Too)
✅ Only 8 players project above 50 FV = low-tier compression
✅ College LHPs dominate because of repeatable metrics & velocity
✅ Teams using pitch design + EV + K-BB filters get edge in every round
✅ Bonus pool exploitation is more valuable than top pick position
📌 5 Data Plays to Watch on Draft Day
Nationals will take Kade Anderson — safest SP profile by model variance.
Angels leaning toward Doyle: high spin, high FB velocity, fast-track metrics.
Mariners might break pattern with Jamie Arnold or HS bat, depending on EV model.
Guardians will over slot mid-round prep arms (again).
Holliday could drop if teams fear swing-and-miss — creating huge arbitrage for data-savvy clubs.
📈 Build or Bet on the Draft? Here’s Your Playbook:
Track K-BB% ≥30%, FB velocity, and spin rates.
Prioritize hitters with ≥92 avg EV, >10% barrel, and <20% K-rate.
Run WAR projection variance models across 5-year windows.
Apply Monte Carlo draft modeling to simulate pick value by round.
Underslot early + overslot late = asymmetric return path.