- Blunt Insights
- Posts
- 🏀 The Turning Point: NBA Finals Game 4 Recap + Game 5 Data War Room
🏀 The Turning Point: NBA Finals Game 4 Recap + Game 5 Data War Room
A no-fluff, data-dripping breakdown of the biggest game in basketball. Every number. Every edge.

🔥 GAME 4 RECAP: Thunder 111, Pacers 104
Series tied 2–2 | Momentum violently reset.
“When the air gets thin, Shai breathes deeper.”
📈 What the Numbers Say
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander:
35 PTS (15 in last 4:38)
+13 plus-minus in the 4th
64.3% TS (true shooting), 0 turnovers in the 4Q
Fourth Quarter Collapse – Indiana:
17 total points
0-for-8 from three
1 assist, 4 turnovers
27.8% FG
Key Supporting Roles (OKC):
Jalen Williams: 27 PTS, 6 REB, 3 STL
Alex Caruso: 20 off the bench on 5-for-6 shooting
Chet Holmgren: 15 REB, 3 BLK, contested Haliburton on 4 of final 6 possessions
Advanced Metrics:
Metric
OKC
IND
eFG% (adj shooting)
56.7%
50.1%
FT Rate
43.2
19.4
Rebounding Edge
+9
–
Points in Paint
48
36
Line Impact: Thunder covered the –4.5 spread. Under cashed (O/U closed at 227.5).
📊 THE WAR ROOM: GAME 5 PREVIEW (MON, JUNE 16)
Venue: Paycom Center, OKC
Time: 8:30 PM ET on ABC
Line: Thunder –9.5 | O/U: 224.5
Series: Tied 2–2
Historical Odds: Game 5 winner in a 2–2 NBA Finals series wins 82.6% of the time.
🧠 KEY MATCHUPS
🔓 Thunder Edge Metrics
Home Record: 44–8 (NBA-best)
Q4 Scoring Margin (at home): +5.2
SGA Home Stats: 33.8 PPG, 8.1 AST, 60.3% eFG
Bench Points (Home): 32.7 average vs just 21.9 on the road
🔒 Pacers Path to Upset
Carlisle’s counter: Expect Mathurin/Nembhard rotation earlier to maintain tempo
3P% rebound: Pacers 2nd in NBA in 3P rate; regression to mean after 0/8 in Q4 likely
Haliburton under pressure:
Game 4: 17 PTS, 8 AST, but 0-for-4 in 4Q
Guarded by Caruso + Dort in hybrid switches (held to 29.1% FG this postseason in those matchups)
💡 ADVANCED PROP TRENDS & EDGES
Player | Stat Prop | Trend | Verdict |
---|---|---|---|
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander | 34.5 Points | Hit 4 of last 5 games | OVER – Usage spike |
Haliburton | 4.5 Rebounds | Under 3 in last 5 | UNDER – Boxed out by length |
Jalen Williams | 1.5 Steals | Cleared in 6 of last 8 | OVER – Disruptor mode |
Chet Holmgren | 7.5 Rebounds | 15 in Game 4 | OVER – Dominating verticality |
🔬 ANALYTICS EDGE: THE CLUTCH INDEX
Player | Clutch Scoring (Last 5 mins, ±5) | eFG% | TO Rate | Impact |
---|---|---|---|---|
SGA | 15 PTS (Game 4 alone) | 75% | 0% | Elite closer |
Haliburton | 0 PTS | 0% | 11% | Vulnerable under blitz |
Caruso | +13 on-court differential | 67% | 0 | Silent killer |
Chet Holmgren | 2 BLK, 3 DREB | – | – | Paint anchor |
🧠 STRATEGIC SWING FACTORS
1. OKC’s Free Throw Dominance
Game 4 FTAs: 38 (vs Pacers' 17)
Drives per game: 56 (NBA-high this postseason)
2. Carlisle’s Final Adjustment
Zone-to-man hybrid scheme flopped in 4Q
Expect more high-switch traps on SGA early, forcing corner looks
3. Who Wins the Bench Battle?
Caruso, Joe, Holmgren vs. Mathurin, McConnell, Nesmith
Game 4: OKC bench outscored IND bench 38–20
💰 FINAL CALL: GAME 5 SHARP LEAN
Spread: Thunder –9.5 ✅
Total: Lean UNDER 224.5 ✅
Player Prop Parlay (0.5U):
SGA Over 34.5 PTS
Holmgren Over 7.5 REB
Caruso Over 1.5 3PM
✅ +480 payout potential
The pivot is here. Game 5 isn’t just a contest—it's a corridor to championship DNA.
If OKC wins, history shows they walk away with the title over 8 times in 10.
If Indiana wants chaos—they’ll need clutch flow, a Haliburton resurrection, and a defensive counterpunch.
Blunt Insight is watching.
You're either building a dynasty—or running out of time.